Exaggerated physical differences between male and female superheroes

Superheroes like Thor and Black Widow may have what it takes to save the world in movies like Avengers: Endgame, but neither of their comic book depictions has a healthy body mass index (BMI). New research from Binghamton University and SUNY Oswego found that, within the pages of comic books, male superheroes are on average obese, while females are on average close to underweight.

Binghamton University PhD student Laura Johnsen and SUNY Oswego Associate Professor of Human Development Rebecca Burch, lead author of the study, collected BMI data for 3,752 Marvel Comics characters and examined the visualization of male and female superheroes, paying attention to physical dimensions and costuming that accentuated hyper-masculine or hyper-feminine features such as shoulder-to-waist ratio, jawlines, upper body muscularity, waist-to-hip ratio and breast morphology. They found that male comic book superheroes were on average “obese,” whereas females averaged at the low end of normal weight. The male higher body mass was caused by extreme upper-body muscularity, with male shoulder-to-waist ratios far above human limits. This is in stark contrast to low weight female superhero bodies with far-lower waist-to-hip ratios than average humans.

“The main findings were that comic book characters are an expression of supernormal stimuli, and they have body morphology that is beyond what humans are capable of having,” said Johnsen. “For male and female characters, there are certain characteristics that are associated with masculinity and femininity; for males, that tends to be wide shoulders and a narrow waist, and for females that tends to be a small waist-to-hip ratio, and a larger bust. These are traits that humans tend to find attractive, but for comic book characters, artists take those traits and make them super-exaggerated. The male characters are hypermasculine and the female characters are hyperfeminine.”

Johnsen and Burch published these findings in a paper titled “Captain Dorito and the bombshell: Supernormal stimuli in comics and film,” in the journal Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. “Captain Dorito” refers to a 2014 meme which compared the high shoulder-to-waist ratio of Captain America actor Chris Evans to a Dorito.

“People who read comic books know that these body types are fantastical representations of the human form,” said Johnsen. “It’s pretty clear you can’t create that body type through just diet and exercise. Even for the films, the costume designers have to modify costumes to make the actors look even more robust than they actually are in real life.”

The researchers were interested in providing a biological context for this pop-culture phenomenon. The physical appearance of comic book characters has been discussed and criticized for their use of exaggerated body-types, but that discussion rarely ever touches upon what those body types represent from a biological standpoint, said Johnsen.

“The hypermasculine and hyperfeminine forms of the male and female characters are an exaggerated reflection of endocrine markers that have evolved to signal youth, health and fertility in real humans,” she said.

Comics are another example in a long history of artists creating supernormal stimuli, emphasizing all the features people find attractive about the human form, said Johnsen.

“Comic books and films are sometimes trivialized as “kids’ stuff,” but increasingly they offer detailed and creative storylines and fine artistry,” she said. “They also offer themes that reflect deep human emotion and desire. By studying comics from an evolutionary perspective, we gain insight as to the underlying origins for why the characters look the way they do, why we are attracted to them and why we connect with them on such a personal level.”

Johnsen and Burch are interested in looking at other markers for masculinity and femininity, as well as how a character’s arc might influence how their appearance changes over time.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Binghamton University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

The new ‘runner’s high’? Some often mix weed, workouts

Eight out of 10 marijuana users in states where cannabis is legal say they partake in the drug shortly before or after exercise, and most report that it motivates them to work out, helps them enjoy exercise more and improves their recovery, according to surprising new University of Colorado Boulder research.

The paper, published Tuesday in the journal Frontiers in Public Health, is among the first to explore the complicated intersection between cannabis use and physical activity.

While many assume the former impedes the later, the data suggest otherwise.

“There is a stereotype that cannabis use leads people to be lazy and couch-locked and not physically active, but these data suggest that this is not the case,” said senior author Angela Bryan, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and the Institute for Cognitive Science.

She stresses that she is in no way recommending using cannabis as an adjunct to exercise.

“The evidence is not there yet,” she said. “But I am also not convinced it is harmful.”

Marijuana is now legal for recreational use in 10 states and medicinal use in dozens more. Yet, little is known about how rising acceptance could impact public health measures like physical activity and obesity.

Some have speculated that increased use could worsen the obesity epidemic by fueling a sedentary lifestyle. On the other hand, the authors note, the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibits cannabis use in sporting competitions due to its potential to improve performance.

Anecdotally, ultrarunners sometimes use marijuana to battle nausea and boredom on long runs. And epidemiological studies show cannabis-users tend to be leaner, less prone to diabetes and have healthier blood sugar levels.

“There are a lot of interesting data points and hypotheses out there but not a lot of them have been tested,” says Bryan.

In a first step toward filling the research gap, she and her colleagues surveyed 600 adult marijuana users in California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, asking — among other questions — if they ever used cannabis within one hour before or four hours after exercise.

Eighty-two percent said ‘yes.’

“We were stunned it was that high,” says Bryan.

A follow-up question of 345 “co-users” (people who use cannabis with exercise) found they were more likely to use it after than before. But 67% said they did both.

Among those who co-used, 70% said it increased enjoyment of exercise, 78% said it boosted recovery, and 52% said it heightened motivation.

“Given that these are all recognized barriers to exercise, it is possible that cannabis might actually serve as a benefit to exercise engagement,” the authors write.

Only 38% said it boosted performance, and in fact some small previous studies have suggested it may harm it.

Notably, those who co-used also got about 43 minutes more exercise per week than those who didn’t.

How might cannabis, physiologically, impact physical activity?

“There is evidence to suggest that certain cannabinoids dampen pain perception, and we also know that the receptors cannabis binds to in the brain are very similar to the receptors that are activated naturally during the runners high,” said co-author Arielle Gillman, a former PhD student in Bryan’s lab who recently published a review paper on the subject. “Theoretically, you could imagine that if it could dampen pain and induce an artificial ‘runner’s high,’ it could keep people motivated.”

Cannabis is also anti-inflammatory, which could aid recovery.

The study did not look at which kind of cannabis (edibles, smoked flower, etc.) people use alongside exercise.

The authors note that the survey has limitations, in that it looked only at people who use cannabis regularly and focused on states which have already legalized it.

But more research is already in the works at CU Boulder, comparing the activity levels of older adults who use cannabis with those who do not.

Preliminary results of that separate study show that after embarking on a 16-week exercise program, the cannabis users exercised more than the non-users.

“As we get older, exercise starts to hurt, and that is one reason older adults don’t exercise as much,” Bryan said. “If cannabis could ease pain and inflammation, helping older adults to be more active that could be another benefit.”

Graduate students Sophie York Williams (first author), Charleen Gust and Raeghan Mueller, Assistant Professor Cinnamon Bidwell and Professor Kent Hutchison contributed to this study.

Is Double Cleansing Truly Worth Your Precious Time?

Washing the oil, dirt, and dead skin off your face is simultaneously one of the simplest and kindest things you can do for your skin. But that hasn’t stopped the skin-care community from making the cleansing process seem very, very complicated.

Whether you’re considering giving double cleansing a try (literally using two different types of cleansers, one after the other) or testing out the myriad varieties of cleansers on the market, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed.

Don’t worry—we’re about to make your approach to cleansing as clear as your ideal pores.

First things first: Here’s how often you should wash your face.

Even if your options for a decent cleanser and solid routine are seemingly endless, don’t wash your hands (or face) of cleansing altogether.

Regularly washing your face (once in the morning, once before bed, and after any activity that involves sweating) prevents clogged pores, refreshes the skin, and even helps mitigate the symptoms of some skin conditions, such as rosacea and acne, Jamie B. MacKelfresh, MD, assistant professor in the department of dermatology at Emory University, tells SELF.

Some people may find that washing with an actual cleanser twice a day is too much and prefer to just use cold water, micellar water, or a mild cleanser in the morning, saving their more intense cleansers with active ingredients for nighttime. Unless your skin is very dry (in which case Dr. MacKelfresh says it’s totally fine to limit cleansing to once a day), basically everyone can benefit from washing their face in one way or another at least twice a day.

If your current cleanser isn’t making a huge difference in your skin’s quality—say, if your acne remains or actually worsens—you should check with your derm to make sure there isn’t a better option out there for you, Dr. MacKelfresh says. And, oh, what options there are!

Here’s how to pick the right cleanser for your skin and habits.

Generally, you can categorize cleansers by their main ingredient (their “base”), which will go a long way in pointing you toward the right cleanser for your skin. Cleansers can be water-based, cream-based, gel-based, or oil-based, Syril Keena Que, MD, MPH, assistant professor of clinical dermatology at Indiana University, tells SELF.

The right type of cleanser for you depends on your skin type and the other products you use. When in doubt, pay attention to what your skin is like “at baseline,” or what it’s like when you first wake up, before applying any products to your face, Dr. MacKelfresh says. For example, if it’s greasy to the touch, you can quite safely assume that you have oily skin. If you don’t take these characteristics into consideration when shopping for a cleanser, you may end up with a product that at the very least isn’t effective and, at worst, irritates your skin.

If you have dry or sensitive skin:
A cream-based cleanser is about as gentle and moisturizing as you can get, so it’d work nicely for someone with dry or sensitive skin. But people with dry skin should usually avoid gel-based or “foaming” face washes because they often contain sulfates, ingredients that can irritate or dry out skin, Dr. Que says. Some of her favorite, ultra-gentle cleansers are CeraVe Hydrating Cleanser, $14, and Free & Clear Liquid Cleanser, $8. For people with extremely sensitive skin, Dr. MacKelfresh says a simple rinse with water will do the trick.

People with sensitive skin may also need to pay attention to the rest of their cleanser’s ingredients, too. For example, Dr. Que says that washes containing alcohol may increase redness, while Dr. MacKelfresh points to strong fragrances as possible irritants. “Simple is going to be better for these people,” she explains. And some cream-based cleansers also contain ingredients known to help with acne (like salicylic acid and benzoyl peroxide), which might be irritating for people with super-sensitive skin.

If you have oily or acne-prone skin:
A gel-based cleanser will be more drying because it likely contains more acids than a cream-based one, Dr. Que says, which means that someone with oily or acne-prone skin would be able to tolerate it better. Dr. Que recommends Neutrogena Oil-Free Acne Wash, $9, (which contains salicylic acid), Panoxyl Acne Creamy Wash, $12, (specifically the version with 4 percent benzoyl peroxide), and Aveeno Clear Complexion Foaming Cleanser, $9, for oily skin and acne.

If you have normal skin:
If you’d describe your skin as “normal” (not too dry and not too oily), a water-based cleanser would be a safe, neutral choice that’s not likely to cause any problems. Dr. Que points to Neutrogena Naturals Purifying Facial Cleanser, $8, for those with this “middle of the road” skin type, while Dr. MacKelfresh says very few cleansers would be totally off-limits for people with normal skin—as long as it doesn’t irritate you on contact.

If you wear a lot of makeup:
Regardless of your skin type, if you wear heavier products (especially ones that contain vegetable oil or mineral oil as a main ingredient), you might feel like your usual cleansers don’t leave you feeling totally clean. In that case, you might need an oil-based cleanser.

“Oil and water repel each other,” Dr. Que explains. “You want something with oil to attract all the oil from the skin and pull it away.” In other words, to completely remove heavy-duty makeup, you’ll need to fight fire with fire—or, in this case, oil with oil.

Since oil-based cleansers are naturally great at removing dirt and excess oil, they don’t contain many (or sometimes any) surfactants, which are compounds that help break down and separate oil and dirt from the skin so that they can be easily washed away. Some people find that surfactants take away too many of their skin’s natural oils, disrupting the skin’s barrier and drying them out. Oil-based cleansers may still have some surfactants to make it easier to wash the oil off, but they typically don’t have enough to leave you with that stripped-skin feeling—even as the oil thoroughly cleanses your face.

Therefore, if your usual cleanser still leaves you with some excess makeup on your skin, you may want to check out oil-based cleansers like Clinique Take the Day Off Cleansing Balm, $30, DHC Deep Cleansing Oil, $28, or Neutrogena Ultra Light Cleansing Oil, $10.

Additionally, because oil cleansers are less likely to be drying, they may be especially useful for people with dry skin. And although people with oily skin may get more out of cleansers with acne-fighting ingredients, they can still use oil cleansers if they so desire—as long as the products are labeled non-comedogenic, meaning they won’t clog pores, Dr. Que advises.

So, what’s the deal with double cleansing?

Often described as a must-try process for anyone who cares about getting their skin clean, double cleansing is just what it sounds like: A two-step routine in which you wash your face with a cleansing oil or oil-based cleanser first, then wash it again with a water- or gel-based cleanser.

This one-two punch is intended to clean the skin more thoroughly, as the first cleanser dissolves makeup, sunscreen, and other heavy products, while the second cleanser gets rid of anything that’s left over. If you don’t mind doubling the time and money you already spend on washing your face, double cleansing sounds pretty pleasant. But it probably isn’t a skin-care cure-all.

For one thing, Dr. Que reminds us not to discount how effective many of today’s cleansers can be—many non-oil cleansers are already formulated in a way that removes makeup and dirt in one fell swoop without being dehydrating.

It’s also not always a great idea to cleanse your skin that often, Dr. MacKelfresh says. “We have to be really careful with getting too obsessed with over-cleansing our skin,” she adds, explaining that the lipids and oils that occur naturally on the skin are crucial to maintaining a healthy barrier. If we wash our faces too frequently or too vigorously, that barrier can easily end up compromised. “The skin has a lot of natural functions that we don’t want to disrupt by being too harsh on it,” Dr. MacKelfresh says.

That said, if you use a ton of heavy products or have very oily skin (or a combination of the two), you may find that a single cleanser doesn’t leave your skin feeling totally clean. If that’s the case, Dr. Que says there’s no harm in trying out double cleansing, especially if it means swapping one harsh cleanser for two that are gentler on your skin.

As long as you stop to make sure that your skin type and lifestyle are suited to double cleansing before you hop on the trend, you won’t be taking much of a risk. And, if you notice any additional dryness or irritation once you start double cleansing, that’s your cue to cut back.

Washing your face is pretty simple, but the process of getting to know your skin may be more complicated. The next time you want to tweak your cleansing routine, ask yourself (or your derm) what your skin needs before selecting a new product or regimen—your answer will more than likely do the selecting for you.

Related: